- tdd-red.md 66 lines · 3.4 KB
TDD Red Phase - Write Failing Tests First
Focus on writing clear, specific failing tests that describe the desired behaviour from GitHub issue requirements before any implementation exists.
GitHub Issue Integration
Branch-to-Issue Mapping
- Extract issue number from branch name pattern:
*{number}*that will be the title of the GitHub issue - Fetch issue details using MCP GitHub, search for GitHub Issues matching
*{number}*to understand requirements - Understand the full context from issue description and comments, labels, and linked pull requests
Issue Context Analysis
- Requirements extraction - Parse user stories and acceptance criteria
- Edge case identification - Review issue comments for boundary conditions
- Definition of Done - Use issue checklist items as test validation points
- Stakeholder context - Consider issue assignees and reviewers for domain knowledge
Core Principles
Test-First Mindset
- Write the test before the code - Never write production code without a failing test
- One test at a time - Focus on a single behaviour or requirement from the issue
- Fail for the right reason - Ensure tests fail due to missing implementation, not syntax errors
- Be specific - Tests should clearly express what behaviour is expected per issue requirements
Test Quality Standards
- Descriptive test names - Use clear, behaviour-focused naming like
Should_ReturnValidationError_When_EmailIsInvalid_Issue{number} - AAA Pattern - Structure tests with clear Arrange, Act, Assert sections
- Single assertion focus - Each test should verify one specific outcome from issue criteria
- Edge cases first - Consider boundary conditions mentioned in issue discussions
C# Test Patterns
- Use xUnit with FluentAssertions for readable assertions
- Apply AutoFixture for test data generation
- Implement Theory tests for multiple input scenarios from issue examples
- Create custom assertions for domain-specific validations outlined in issue
Execution Guidelines
- Fetch GitHub issue - Extract issue number from branch and retrieve full context
- Analyse requirements - Break down issue into testable behaviours
- Confirm your plan with the user - Ensure understanding of requirements and edge cases. NEVER start making changes without user confirmation
- Write the simplest failing test - Start with the most basic scenario from issue. NEVER write multiple tests at once. You will iterate on RED, GREEN, REFACTOR cycle with one test at a time
- Verify the test fails - Run the test to confirm it fails for the expected reason
- Link test to issue - Reference issue number in test names and comments
Red Phase Checklist
- GitHub issue context retrieved and analysed
- Test clearly describes expected behaviour from issue requirements
- Test fails for the right reason (missing implementation)
- Test name references issue number and describes behaviour
- Test follows AAA pattern
- Edge cases from issue discussion considered
- No production code written yet
Scanned by NVIDIA SkillSpector
Automated static analysis (no LLM) · v2.12.0 · 2026-10-17
SkillSpector looks for patterns such as shell commands, credential access, network calls or unpinned dependencies. An observation is something worth reading in the files before you install, not a confirmed vulnerability. Components that run code locally, like hooks, MCP servers and security tooling, naturally show more of them.
No observations.
Learn more about NVIDIA SkillSpector or how components are reviewed.